BETTER can access weather data from the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for 8152 weather stations globally between 2010 and 2021. BETTER accesses weather files from NOAA that contain sub-hourly outdoor air temperature; aggregates this data; and then calculates the average outdoor air temperature during a given billing period. For buildings in locations that are not close to NOAA weather stations, or that have on-site weather stations, a user has the option to manually enter into the BETTER web application the average outdoor air temperature for each utility bill.
BETTER only considers outdoor dry-bulb air temperature in weather normalization.
In many cases, buildings use natural gas as well as delivered fossil fuels, such as fuel oil. In those cases, we suggest "allocating" the delivered fuel to mimic the natural gas consumption profile in the building, so the billing start and end dates for the delivered fossil fuel will mimic the billing start and end dates of natural gas. Alternatively, if natural gas is not used by the building, you can approximate the billing start and end dates based on the fuel delivery dates.
BETTER works best when a user enters 12 consecutive months of energy usage and cost (for all fuels used in a building). However, if a user does not have monthly energy cost information, BETTER will estimate the monthly energy cost (based on monthly usage) for the following fuel types according to the fuel unit price information contained in the linked source files:
At this time, BETTER can only intake monthly energy usage data (broken down by fuel type). If you have smart meter data that quantifies energy usage at more granular intervals (e.g., hourly, daily, weekly), you will need to aggregate it to monthly energy usage. We are investigating adding capability to BETTER to read smart meter data and will announce it in our News section when available.
At this time, BETTER allows a user to input energy costs only in U.S. dollars.
At this time, BETTER will reject negative energy consumption values and won't generate a change-point model and assess energy efficiency measures (EEM) for that building. BETTER requires 12 consecutive months of positive energy consumption values to assess EEMs.
BETTER calendarize utility bills by allocating the energy consumption by calendar months. Specifically, it allocates the energy consumption in a utility bill to each calendar month based on the number of days in each month. For example, if a utility bill covers the period from January 15 to February 15, BETTER will allocate 16/31 of the energy consumption to January and 15/31 of the energy consumption to February. Then, utility bills of the same type (e.g., electricity) are aggregated by calendar month. The subsequent steps of BETTER analytics are performed on the aggregated calendarized utility bills.
BETTER can be used to analyze the performance of any commercial building type for which a user can enter all required data (e.g., gross floor area, type, location, 12 consecutive months of energy use for all fuels) for at least 30 buildings. The following commercial building types are most frequently input into BETTER for analysis: bank branch, courthouse, data center, distribution center, financial office, hospital (general medical and surgical), hotel, K-12 school, multifamily housing, non-refrigerated warehouse, office, refrigerated warehouse, retail store, senior care community, supermarket/grocery store. For definitions of these space types, click here. At this time, BETTER can also be used to analyze the performance of a single building, or a portfolio of less than 30 buildings, for the U.S. office and K-12 school space types and Mexican offices.
First, see if you can determine the building’s primary space type. This is the space type that accounts for more than 50% of the building. For example, if you enter a building that has an office that accounts for 60% of the gross floor area (GFA) (excluding parking) and a retail store that accounts for 40% of the GFA, then the primary space type will be office. This primary space type is used to determine the peer group for benchmarking in BETTER. If no individual space type accounts for more than 50 % of the building space, then it is mixed use. To evaluate energy savings for mixed use buildings in BETTER, we recommend determining the size and monthly energy usage for each space in the building and benchmarking each of these spaces separately.
R-squared (R2) is a goodness-of-fit measure for regression models. It quantifies the proportion of the variability for a dependent variable that's explained by an independent variable, or variables, in a regression model. In the case of BETTER, R2 indicates to what extent variations in outdoor air temperature explain variations in building energy use intensity. An R2 of 1 means that all changes in energy use intensity is completely explained by changes in outdoor air temperature. In general, we recommend users select an R2 of 0.6 or higher when creating a portfolio or building analytics.
When running BETTER analytics, the R2 threshold sets the minimum goodness-of-fit requirements for change-point models. As a result, when running a portfolio analytics, different R2 thresholds may lead to different results:
In general, we recommend users select an R2 of 0.6 or higher for a portfolio or building.
When analyzing a portfolio or building, BETTER offers users the ability to select an energy savings target based on the scale of savings desired. Users can select from the following targets each time they run an analytical report for a portfolio or a building:
The “reference” benchmark statistics method allows a BETTER user to benchmark a commercial building’s inverse model coefficients (i.e., electric and fossil baseloads, heating and cooling change-points, and heating and cooling slopes) against the median and standard deviation for each of these inverse model coefficients derived from a training dataset. Alternatively, the “generate” benchmark statistics method allows a user with a portfolio of commercial buildings (recommended to be at least 30) of a single space type to benchmark "internally." Thus, instead of comparing a building’s inverse model coefficients to the median and standard deviation of the training dataset, BETTER generates a unique set of statistics (i.e., the median and standard deviation for their own portfolio’s electric and fossil baseloads, heating and cooling change-points, and heating and cooling slopes) based solely on the user’s input portfolio - so the user is essentially comparing buildings within their own portfolio to identify cost-saving energy and emission reduction opportunities. We recommend that users include at least 30 buildings of a single space type when using the “generate” benchmark statistics method of analysis.
We take the following steps to develop U.S. “reference” benchmark statistics for building space types:
We take the following steps to develop international “reference” benchmark statistics for building space types:
We have developed “reference” benchmark statistics for U.S. offices and U.S. K-12 schools and Mexican offices. We are currently working to develop “reference” benchmark statistics for U.S. multifamily residential buildings. Please contact us at email@example.com there is an additional space type for which you would like us to develop “reference” benchmark statistics. Click on this link to know more about the U.S. benchmark statistic development process and this link to learn more about the international benchmark statistic development process.
At this time, the “reference” benchmark statistics for U.S. offices and K-12 schools are not perfectly representative of the U.S. national stock because the statistics were not developed from the U.S. Energy Administration (EIA) Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) dataset ( which is representative of the U.S. national stock) but rather from training datasets developed based on voluntary contributions from U.S. industry that are not fully representative of the U.S. national stock in terms of characteristics such as size and climate zone distribution. We are working to expand these training datasets, and hence improve associated “reference” benchmark statistics, so they are more representative of the U.S. national stock. This includes expanding the training data sets to include: at least 30 data points for each of the 10 BETTER model coefficients for each of the eight CBECS size categories> in each of the eight International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) climate zones in the United States (and possibly for each of the relevant subtypes A, B, and C in these zones). To contribute anonymous data to this effort, please email firstname.lastname@example.org. Additionally, at this time, “reference” statistics are only available for U.S. offices and K-12 schools, but we are gradually adding other space types (beginning with U.S. multifamily). To know more about the benchmark statistics development process, click on this link .
Use of BETTER’s analytical engine with over 700 buildings globally indicates that a portfolio size of 30 buildings is generally sufficient in order to “generate” benchmark statistics and benchmark a portfolio “internally” (i.e., compare buildings within a portfolio and not against “U.S. reference” benchmark statistics to identify cost-saving energy and GHG emission reduction opportunities). This means that a portfolio size of 30 allows BETTER to generate two inverse models for each building in the dataset (one electric and one fossil); extract inverse model coefficients; anf fit a normal distribution to the extracted inverse model coefficients that passes the KS test). This being said, we know that some building portfolios are highly uniform in terms of the use of electricity and fossil energy for baseload, heating, and cooling, and a smaller portfolio of 20-25 buildings could generate robust benchmarking statistics for "internal” benchmarking. In other cases, where portfolios have missing data points or variations in outdoor air temperature do not significantly explain variations in energy use intensity, then a portfolio size of 30-50 buildings may be needed to deliver viable statistics for "internal” benchmarking. However, overall work to-date on BETTER’s analytical engine for 700 buildings suggests that 30 buildings “generates” benchmark statistics sufficient to identify buildings in a portfolio with energy saving potential and the set of energy efficiency measures that should be implemented to capture these savings. See the links below for case studies of portfolios that benchmarked “internally” to reduce energy usage and costs.
BETTER offers analysis in both unit systems, and a user can easily switch between the two unit systems in the BETTER web app. Go to the upper right corner of the upper navigation bar of the web app to select the unit system in which you want to enter/view data in BETTER. To view/enter data in the metric or international system (IS) of units (kWh, square meters, °C), select SI. To view/enter data in the imperial system (IP) of units (kBtu, square feet, °F), select IP. You can change the system in which you view/enter data in BETTER at any time by changing the unit system in the upper right corner of the navigation bar.
At this time, BETTER cannot provide estimated energy, cost, and GHG emissions reductions associated with implementing a single energy efficiency measure (e.g., envelope retrofit). However, BETTER will identify which energy efficiency measures (from a total of 15 measures, ranging from lighting upgrades to envelope upgrades) your building could benefit from, and the total energy, cost, and GHG emissions reductions that could be achieved from implementing all of BETTER’s recommended energy efficiency measures in your building or portfolio.
BETTER utilizes data-driven techniques to analyze a building's monthly energy consumption in response to weather conditions. Change-point models are fitted between daily energy use intensity (EUI) and outdoor air temperature to determine the weather-sensitive and weather-independent components of electricity and fossil fuel energy consumption, respectively. The energy consumption values reported are predictions generated by the change-point models, which may differ from the actual entered values. The figure on the right displays an example change-point model, where the black dots represent the actual EUI, and the orange dots represent the predicted EUI. Generally, a better change-point model results in smaller discrepancies between the entered and predicted energy consumption values.
Continuing from the previous example, the figure demonstrates how change-point models are utilized to predict the current and target levels of EUIs. These values are then used to estimate energy consumption and calculate savings. The solid lines in the figure depict the current change-point model fitted using actual data, while the dashed lines represent the target change-point model, which shows the improvement in coefficients to reach the target level. In this example, the baseload is reduced, the cooling change-point is shifted to the right, and the cooling slope is made less steep. The current level EUIs (represented by orange dots) and target level EUIs (represented by green dots) are predicted using the actual monthly average outdoor air temperatures. Finally, the predicted EUIs are utilized to estimate annual energy consumption and calculate savings using the formula below (note that the summation is over the last 12 months):
Σ[(EUIcurrent - EUItarget) × floor_area ×
BETTER is currently available in English, Spanish and French.